The theory of attachment has its roots in psychoanalysis. But how much do they really apply to the average person looking for love? Indeed, are attachment signs really meaningful at all in terms of determining compatibility? Or are they, like love languages, a pop psychology fad that's more fun than serious? ![]() It's all well and good that psychologists think about these things. Indeed, attachment theory is taught in psychology programs and taken seriously by psychologists and psychoanalysts alike. Unlike the mysticism of zodiac signs, the idea of a person's attachment style is rooted in psychology theory. Recently, Americans have been obsessed with attachment styles - the idea that there are four "patterns" of attachment, and that these can help determine both the success of a relationship as well as how to communicate with one's partner. Some of these are more grounded in folk wisdom than others - say, zodiac sign versus Myers-Briggs type - while others are purported to based in psychology, such as enneagram type or love language. ![]() American singles have no shortage of rubrics they can turn to for determining romantic compatibility.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |